Home
Victoria
Port Melbourne
...

Singles from Port Melbourne

We investigated the distribution of the 1,450 singles from Port Melbourne among the single sites.

Who are you looking for on Port Melbourne?

  1. Long Term or Short Term
    • Long Term:
      Dating and Matchmaking
    • Short Term:
      Casual Dates and Encounters
  2. Looking for males or females?
    • Females
    • Males
600 Females from Port Melbourne 860 Males from Port Melbourne

This is the males distribution:

This is the distribution of single women on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of men that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

This is the distribution of women that are willing to cheat on dating sites on the internet:

Ashley Madison

Ashley Madison
30 Females 70 Males from Port Melbourne
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

EliteSingles

EliteSingles
150 Females 150 Males from Port Melbourne
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

C-date

C-date
20 Females 30 Males from Port Melbourne
Test winner for freeIn-depth review

Red Hot Pie

Red Hot Pie
160 Females 240 Males from Port Melbourne
Test Red Hot Pie for freeIn-depth review

eHarmony

eHarmony
30 Females 30 Males from Port Melbourne
Test eHarmony for freeIn-depth review

Zoosk

Zoosk
20 Females 20 Males from Port Melbourne
Test Zoosk for freeIn-depth review

Adult Match Maker

Adult Match Maker
150 Females 350 Males from Port Melbourne
Test Adult Match Maker for freeIn-depth review

Find singles from these areas too:

How do we get our data?

See more info on our calculation method

X

To determine how many singles can be found at about the individual Dating-Services, we have calculated a complicated process associated with several assumptions.

In this calculation process values from statistics, population figures, membership of the respective Dating-Services and different mathematical distribution methods are discussed.

Please note: We expressly point out that our calculated results may differ from the actual display regional membership; this is not inconceivable. We have, as far as we are able, the calculation method optimized so that useful guidance values are calculated. Unfortunately, there can still be differences, we apologize for any inconvenience.